Search Results

If your search results are too broad, or if you're having trouble understanding the display of results below, you may wish to read our FAQ on Searching the Web Site.

Results for: series:"civil justice survey of state courts: [united states] series" (5)

5 results found, sorted by title

score using date

1-5

Civil Justice Survey of State Courts, 1992: [United States] This survey is the first broad-based, systematic examination of the nature of civil litigation in state general jurisdiction trial courts. Data collection was carried out by the National Center for State Courts with ...	2006-03-30

Civil Justice Survey of State Courts, 1996: [United States] In 1996, the Bureau of Justice Statistics awarded a grant to the National Center for State Courts to gather detailed information on tort, contract, and real property rights trial cases in 45 jurisdictions chosen to ...	2004-06-10

Civil Justice Survey of State Courts, 2001: [United States] This data collection examined general civil cases (torts, contracts, and real property) disposed of by bench or jury trial in the nation's 75 most populous counties in 2001. Information reported includes the type of ...	2005-11-04

Civil Justice Survey of State Courts, 2005 [United States] The Civil Justice Survey of State Courts (CJSSC), 2005 is a systematic examination of general civil (that is, tort, contract, and real property) cases disposed of by bench or jury trial in a national sample of state ...	2009-01-15

Supplemental Survey of Civil Appeals, 2001 [United States] The 2001 Supplemental Survey of Civil Appeals is a follow-up to the CIVIL JUSTICE SURVEY OF STATE COURTS, 2001: [UNITED STATES] (ICPSR 3957) which examined 8,311 general civil cases (e.g., tort, contract, and real ...	2006-08-21

1-5

Where are my facets?

When you search for data on the ICPSR Web site, you're using SOLR, which allows for faceted searching. When you search Web site, you're using Verity UltraSeek, which does not allow for faceted searching. Because typical Web pages don't have a lot of fielded content, it wouldn't work very well.